11 Comments
User's avatar
Ginny K's avatar

Thank you for writing this. This is yet another decision that demonstrates that the Roberts court is destroying the foundation of our democracy.

Expand full comment
Shauna's avatar

Heaven help us...as we must now Help ourselves in the Fight back for our Country .... and this will not be easy ... but the alternative is so so so much worse ! It is NOT just trump..it is project 2025 Authoritarian playbook and JD Vance is 2nd in line to PUSH their wealth and power to their full ends ... $$$$$$$$$

Expand full comment
Mark Morey's avatar

The Republican plan is, and, for long time, has been to never have anyone but themselves in power again. Thatโ€™s the only reason they would even tolerate someone like Trump. When they chose to cozy up to the Religious Right to get the rural vote, they set the stage for the actualization of IT CANโ€™T HAPPEN HERE. I will never understand how an obvious fake like Donald Trump was able to grab the adoration of working people, but he did, and he delights in being such an obvious charlatan and a destructive monster with regard to the institutions that protect the betterment of society. I can only conclude that a large chunk of humanity hates anybody who is not exactly like them so fiercely that they can only regard these enormities with delight. Some people are capable of anger when Trumpโ€™s antics threaten their farms and businesses, but it may not be sufficient to keep us from being dragged into a vast sea of sheep manure.

Expand full comment
Kamran's avatar

I thought this decision is provisional and does not overturn the existing precedentโ€”Humphreyโ€™s Executor v. United Statesโ€”which generally requires presidents to show cause for firing leaders of independent agencies governed by multi-member boards. Did I misunderstand?

Expand full comment
VALERIE MELUSKEY's avatar

Austin, or someone who knows the answer, please, respond to this question.

Expand full comment
Ben Prickril's avatar

Thank you for shining a light on this SC ruling. Itโ€™s obviously difficult for the public to react to the onslaught of dangerous court rulings, illegal Executive Orders and much more that erode our freedoms and our Constitution. Please provide additional organization names and donation links to make it even easier for us to allocate our limited resources in the best way, and again, thank you.

Expand full comment
Eileen Rรณque's avatar

Play by play from Project 2025 all coming true in real time. Everyone needs to see this

Please Share ๐Ÿ’ž

(From 10 months ago) ๐Ÿ˜ฒ

Not a prediction but rather a nightmare scenario coming true in real time

Expand full comment
Eileen Rรณque's avatar

Guess what? Theyโ€™re in on it, it would seemโ€ฆ

Take a look at this

https://open.substack.com/chat/posts/150d5595-189e-4824-98bc-cd9fffccbd45?utm_source=share

Expand full comment
Bonnie M Follett's avatar

See more about this here (has link to Wilcox opinion and Kagan dissent): https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-remove-agency-heads-without-cause-for-now/

Expand full comment
Nina Borin's avatar

What is SCOTUSโ€™s reasoning?!

Expand full comment
VALERIE MELUSKEY's avatar

Your article requires thorough examination, and if the facts are all correct, we need to spread what your just reported. I'm ready to call Herb Conaway, my new representative who is replacing Andy Kim. Thank you for the link to all House and Senate numbers.

Expand full comment